Team DNA- After the final Presentation

I did this activity a few weeks into the subject. My initial thoughts as to which team members played which roles. How that group has finished completely, I am going to do it again and see which roles really stood out for certain people. It will be interesting to see if results are fairly similar to the first time i did it or if there are any noticeable anomalies. 

This time round i have selected only one role for each person. These roles are the ones that became evident during the end of our team projects, so shaped and plant etc were not really roles important during this phase. 

ARCH1

This is the same as earlier on in the project. Arch1 remained calm throughout he whole process and was really efficient in setting team and individual goals appropriate for each persons skills and interests. He was quite confident in himself and had a way of reassuring the team that everything was going well. He kept track of dates and deadlines very effectively and so was always abel to remind the team eg. two week before presentation..

ARCH2

This one was also true to model a number of weeks ago. This role became extremely evident at the end. Arch2 I think had troubles relying on other people and believing that other could do a good job. Which I suppose is a weakness but being quite the perfectionist, arch2 ensured everything at the end was done well. Polishing and perfecting was being done right before the final presentations which really was not necessary. He always opted to be responsible for printing for presentations. It took the load of everyone else's shoulders but it also meant while he was scrambling round doing last minute things none of the other team members had anything to do. He put unnecessary pressure on himself and ended up getting quite stressed out about it. 

INT1

Also the same. Int1 was a very focussed and dedicated team member. Although she mostly worked by herself on interior matters, whenever anything extra needed to be completed she was always happy to help out. She brought a peace to the team and listened to everyone and asked questions. She was very against tension or friction in the team, and when there were problem with Ind1, she didn't seem to be aware of it in the way everyone else had. 

IND1

I struggle to find a role for Ind1. He did not seem to fulfil any of the vital roles and did not see things through throughout the project. He was not constantly sharing ideas or thoughts with the team, did not offer to do extra work where needed and really was just a poor team worker. But I have decided to place him under specialist. This is because he worked souly on his own, doing his own field. He did not discuss or share his work with anyone and claimed the lateness of his completed work was due to his need to get it "perfect". 

(Sabre Corporate Development)